sariyawashere
sariyawashere sariyawashere
  • 04-06-2020
  • Social Studies
contestada

Question:
According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or
unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?​

Respuesta :

sindlea
sindlea sindlea
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

Answer Link
kassidyjenna2014 kassidyjenna2014
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:unconstitutional

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

what does lysosomes look like
what is the solution to the proportion? 3y-8/12=y/5? Please be really discriptive
Which Chinese dynasty is known for the achievements listed here? A. Ming B. Tang C. Song D. Han Accomplishments: ~improved porcelain by adding more colors
What would happen to the body if the liver is removed????
"My vegetable love should grow/Vaster than empires and more slow" is an example of A) paradox B) hyperbole C) metaphor D).simile Having a hard time, I'm temp
What Chinese dynasty rebuilt the city of beijing?
According to some historians, which marks the beginning of the US Civil War?
what kind of organism is a zooxanthellae
20 percent of what number is 14
A student pushes a 40-N block across the floor for a distance of 10 m. How much work was applied to move the block? A. 4 J B. 40 J C. 400 J D. 4000 J