kathy3560 kathy3560
  • 12-01-2022
  • History
contestada

explain why the facts of Shelby Co. led to the ruling of the case.

Respuesta :

mustafakareem277
mustafakareem277 mustafakareem277
  • 21-01-2022

Answer:

The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, (2013) held that the coverage formula set forth in Section 4(b) of the Act was unconstitutional, and as a consequence, no jurisdictions are now subject to the coverage formula in Section 4(b) or to Sections 4(f)(4) and 5 of Act.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

A machine with a mechanical advantage of 10 is used to produce an output force of 250 newtons. What input force is applied to this machine
solving equationswhat is the value of x 8x+9=5x+18
what is the cause to air pollution??? please help me!!!!
Given the balanced equation representing a reaction: 4Al(s) + 3O2(g) ==> Al2O3(s) As the aluminum loses 12 moles of electrons, the oxygen (1) gains 4 moles o
Log (10-4x) = log (10-3x)
Which element has atoms with the strongest attraction for electrons in a chemical bond? (1) chlorine (3) fluorine (2) nitrogen (4) oxygen
Two forms of solid carbon, diamond and graphite, differ in their physical properties due to the differences in their (1) atomic numbers (2) crystal structures (
Name one branch or part of the government.
the sum of two integers is -1. the product of the integers is -72 find the integers.
We elect a U.S. Representative for how many years?